
The Nintendo Switch has proven to be a hit with gamers thanks to the fact that it can be played both on your TV and in portable mode, but despite this unique selling point, there's still a market for super-slim mobile monitors that allow you to experience the big-screen effect while you're on the move.
One of the biggest issues of using such a screen, however, is that you still need to hook up the Switch dock – and most of the monitors on the market also require their own power supply, which rather limits their usefulness. Carting around all those wires can be a drag, and you need to remain close to a wall socket at all times. When there's that much fuss involved, most people will just settle for using the Switch's built-in 720p display, which is far more convenient.
That's what makes Innlead's AVA wirelessHD screen so interesting. This portable screen uses cutting-edge 'wirelessHD mm-Wave 5G technology' to beam the image from your source to the display, offering a low-latency 'zero-lag' experience that (largely) removes the need for wires. It also works over long distances, with a 20-meter / 66-foot range being mooted by the manufacturer.
We were lucky enough to receive a pre-production sample of the AVA wirelessHD monitor ahead of its crowdfunding launch, and we've been putting it through its paces over the past few days. The model we received is the 13.3-inch variant (which is the smallest Innlead offers – 15.6 and 17.3-inch versions will also be available), and our sample maxes out at 1080p – but we're assured that the final version will offer 4K resolution – not that such a feature is likely to be much of a selling point for Switch owners, of course.
To cut the chase, the way the AVA wirelessHD works is nothing short of remarkable. The magic is all down to the bundled mm-Wave transmitter, which is a small, hockey puck-shaped device that connects via USB-C or Mini-HDMI. This diminutive little object broadcasts the image to the screen automatically without any need to pair devices or undergo a lengthy connection process. You just turn the screen on, connect the transmitter to your source (in some cases, the transmitter also needs its own power supply) and you're away. It feels a bit like witchcraft.

We're normally quite sceptical when any company utters the words 'lag-free' in relation to a product, but we're pleased to report that it's most certainly the case here. There's no noticeable latency between your control inputs and the on-screen action – which perhaps shouldn't be all that shocking when you consider that Nintendo pulled off the same trick with the Wii U almost a decade ago.
The advertised range of 20 meters is, of course, entirely dependent on what obstacles you have between the screen and the source, but we could effortlessly move around the room with the monitor and the connection remained steady (a more pressing concern, in this case, is the distance the Switch Joy-Con / Pro Controller can comfortably manage but the connection becomes unstable). However, the moment you introduce walls or floors into the mix, and the signal drops out, so 'line of sight' is clearly important here. We also noticed some slight compression artefacts when we moved around the room, but these usually vanished the moment we put the screen down.
What makes the AVA wirelessHD so appealing for Switch owners is the fact that the transmitter also acts as a dock, so you can connect your Switch to it and enjoy TV play on the screen without having to use the bulky official dock. Because it's totally wireless – the monitor has its own internal rechargeable battery, which lasts a couple of hours per charge – you can use the screen anywhere that's in range of the transmitter. It might sound like a small thing – and a minor bonus when you consider the Switch itself has its own display and is built expressly with this kind of thing in mind – but moving to a 13.3-inch screen is still a step up. The LCD panel doesn't pop quite as much as the OLED's display, but it's bright and sharp.
The screen itself is built really well, boasting a mix of metal and plastic that feels very solid and premium. The kick-stand is also sturdy and robust, allowing you to view the screen at different angles and even use the screen in TATE mode. Another plus is that the internal speakers are loud and offer decent bass, which cannot be said of all portable monitors. On the downside, the scroll wheel which is used to both power on the unit and make menu selections feels flimsy, while the touch-screen controls sometimes fail to respond to your first input. We also noticed, when using the HDMI connection rather than the USB-C, occasional 'popping' sounds could be heard on the audio. Keep in mind that these are things that could potentially be fixed in the final production version.
It's also worth noting that the mm-Wave transmitter gets hot very quickly, despite having its own internal fan and heat sink. We've also expressed our concerns to Innlead in the light of reports of third-party docks bricking Switch consoles in the past but were told that the "the chipset is very mature" and that the company has "tested and used it for a very long time" since it was prototyped last year. It certainly didn't seem to cause any issues during our test period, but the levels of heat the transmitter kicks out are worrying; it could also do with being slightly larger to assist with heat dissipation.
Outside of gaming, Innlead is pushing the AVA wirelessHD in other ways. It's basically compatible with anything that has HDMI-out, but can also be used with Samsung DeX-ready smartphones, computers (as a second screen) and much more besides. Oh, and it's worth noting that it comes with physical HDMI and USB-C inputs as well, so you can use it as a wired display, should the need arise.
The AVA wirelessHD starts from $489 via its Kickstarter campaign for the 13.3-inch model, with the 15.6-inch version costing $589 and the 17.3 version $729. All of these prices are based on the 'super early bird' deals which are only available via the crowdfunding campaign itself; expect to pay more if you don't commit early or wait until the campaign is finished. That's a lot of money to spend on a portable screen, of course, and given that the Switch itself already has its own built-in display, you could argue that it's money wasted. However, we're still finding unique ways of incorporating the AVA wirelessHD into our daily lives – so there's a chance it could scratch an itch you didn't know existed.
Thanks to Innlead for supplying the unit used in this feature.
Comments 49
looking at all the mucking about the stupid price you can get a really nice 4k or full hd portable screen for half the price.
Holy ***** that price and that's the early bird deal. Just buy an oled switch for portable. Hell it could be your second switch just for portable and you'd save money haha.
For that price they can keep it. My 47" TV cost less!
@Royalblues
Invest in games not hardware.
@SalvorHardin Invest in nothing and break free from the capitalist material mindset.
@Wilforce Because investing in a video game console/games for entertainment is the same as investing in stocks.
@Anguspuss
It's a 4K display on Kickstarter. Not 1080p.
A portable monitor for a portable device that already have a screen. That's all I always needed!!!
And the thing is on kickstarted! 100% reliable!!!
(right now it has 2 backers)
I would rather get the OLED Switch honestly.. cuz when I play handheld I have the Switch right up to my face.. but as @Royalblues said>> I just can’t put any more money into my Switch until a Switch 2 comes out.. besides games of course.. bet that OLED is pretty up close though.. sigh
When you say lag-free, are we talking about as lag-free as using a CRT and AV cables? Or are we just talking about the standard HDMI levels of latency? Because if monitors are able to offer the former, then I feel like competitive gaming might have a bright future where old TV's that are no longer manufactured will not be required anymore.
@Coalescence It’s actually far worse. Consumerism is a control factor in capitalism. At least with stocks you have a chance at maintaining even with inflation.
My Switch also is wireless, portable and has no lag. Why would I want this?
@sanderev Your Switch also has a 6.2-inch 720p screen.
Then you get to the price and realise its largely pointless, that's a lot of money for a limited use product. If only the Switch were portable and had a screen included 🤔
I am not very interested in this personally, but I think either the marketing needs more work or people are being a bit obtuse.
If you’re looking at $/inch, it is indeed a very crappy deal. But you are paying for something that can be set up in ways impossible for TVs and desktop monitors to be set up. TVs are permanently affixed to walls or stands. Monitors can get a little more flexibility with a VESA stand but that’s also stationary. Something like this can be carried from room to room, and angled in whatever manner feasible…or if you’re in your room or at your desk, very easily shifted over to the side. And it can be connected to other devices besides consoles. In short, people for whom space is a premium may find this kind of monitor very appealing.
Heh, good old 60ghz and the fact that a piece of paper could block the signal! lol!
Don't get me wrong, you can totally send 4K video bandwidth with it, but it can be blocked by virtually anything that isn't air! TBH, 60GHz only really makes sense right now for wireless VR and maybe the odd industrial purpose. From what I remember, LG did release a wireless TV in the early 2010s that was one of the first use cases for 60GHz, but early adopters discovered the catch when they couldn't even take the TV out of the room that base station was, and therefore the product flopped and never left South Korea. It's an interesting idea, but you would just be better off using a long cable. But even then, for 4K, the cable market is really messy when it comes to sending 4K signals over distances; Linus Tech Tips has a great video about it when they got their hands on an industrial cable tester. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6lx1ntNoxE
When it comes to this product though, there's might be a use for it, but I doubt that people will by this in the droves.
Damn, that price is astronomical, even taking into account the many ways it can be used. I'm curious what a 2K version of that would cost because at that screen size, 4K isn't doing you many favors vs 2K. Plus, as others have said, you can buy much, much cheaper equipment to rotate your PC monitor and some TVs can even be set up this way as well.
Demon's Tilt! Fantastic fantasy pinball.
@noobish_hat I'm not the author, but nothing to write home about.
202 mil on Normal
219 mil on EX
7,894,800 on Hardcore
Imagine the input lag and delay with this.
@KayFiOS Chances are, and I say that because I'm guessing here, that it'll be the same, or maybe a frame or two late compared with HDMI. After all, it uses HDMI which at best is going to be at least 2-3 frames behind. This isn't an analogue piece of kit, so don't think you're going to get 0 frame latency on this thing, heh!
@Rayquaza2510 Well, they are saying that it's going to be low latency, though in fairness HDMI isn't perfect as it's typically 2-3 frames late at its best. It's when you get to 6 frames of latency is when it gets bad.
@Wilforce better get your flight to North Korea asap!
@Rayquaza2510 Did you notice input lag / delay with the Wii U?
@Damo 7", I have an OLED. And yes, that's better than any TN screen.
And 13" 4K where the input of the Switch is barely 1080p. That is going to look a lot worse than 720p on the 7" OLED screen.
These devices are a waste of money if you only use them with a Switch.
Sure if you are going to use it with a PC/Mac, XBOX, PS5 as well as a Switch then okay. It could by handy for local multiplayer. But other than that, no.
@noobish_hat I reached 365 millions a couple days ago. Wanna hit 500 soon!
@Damo Bear in mind that the Wii U used digital video broadcast for its wireless video transmission rather than using 2.4/5ghz. It eliminates latency (to a degree,) but its range was bad because the signal couldn't be any stronger than 0.5 watts to comply with international transmission laws. A similar thing happened with FM transmitters when they were a thing in the iPod days, they had bad range because it used the FM range of frequencies at 0.5 watts. So it would only work at about 10-20 metres.
@sanderev As was mentioned in the piece, the ideal scenario for this device is using it for more than one device - so it could be your TATE screen for Switch / multiplayer tabletop screen, a way of casting your phone screen to a larger display and a second screen for your computer without using wires. Given that it accepts both USB-C and HDMI for video, there will be plenty of different applications for any user.
The price is too high - as I note in the text - but I've enjoyed using the review unit. Being able to leave my Switch (or PS5) on one side of the room and game using this screen has been handier than I expected.
Thats more expensive than the ps5 I just bought!
@noobish_hat Just got started really and only managed 39k plus...Its kicking my arse but what a game. Love it on the flip grip! Recommend for any pinball heads (i aint one - but will be by the time im done).
The only way I'd consider it is if I decided to use it as a 3rd screen for my laptop as well (would be neat to have an extremely portable monitor) but that price is far too high
@Cosmo_Joe Modern wealth distribution isn’t really all that funny. I make as much money as my father did when he retired, but because of modern wealth distribution it’s only 1/8 as much as it was at the time. Today’s generation is at a serious disadvantage.
@SepticLemon Oof. Then they really shouldn't be using words like "lag-free."
@KayFiOS Well, as long as it isn't slower than HDMI, it'll be fine. You just don't want to add more lag to the 2-3 frames of lag that HDMI has.
Does the Switch run in overclocked "docked mode" when using this device?
If so, is it designed properly to not brick the Switch like some 3rd party docks will?
I could think of lots of business uses for this thing (e.g. An easy way for anyone in a meeting/classroom to project their screen) but I'm completely dumbfounded by this cottage industry of third party portable Switch screens. You're either playing portable or you're plugged into a TV! Is anybody buying these things? In what universe is someone carrying around a Switch and a big ol' screen and a portable dock, just to plonk it down somewhere (where? Not your lap, or a table on a train or plane) and play it (not for long, with all these batteries), just to be able to have a slightly bigger screen than they'd have without any of that rigmarole?
....Is a tiny 4K screen that worth it? I'll just stick with my huge 4K OLED instead.
@HolyGeez03 There's no overclock on the Switch. When it's undocked, it runs in a limited power, underclocked if you want to call it, so that it doesn't chew up the battery life.
When it comes to other docks, the problem that the Switch has is that when it comes to USB-C, one of the voltages that it uses when docked is not a standard voltage that's used in the USB-C standard. So it can get bricked due to not getting the right power.
@SepticLemon Call it what you want...
Question stands... does this device address the potential bricking issue when providing video and pulling video using the Switch USB-C port?
I got a 16 in portable monitor. It has a case that allows it to stand. I got a cheap case for the switch and used industrial Velcro to attach to the back of the monitor stand. It all sits on my lap and I can play games next to the wife and enjoy a better screen. No doc needed. I just plug from the switch to the monitor with the c cable.
@Wilforce
Wealth distribution always follows the pareto distribution, under any economic system. Give 100 ppl each ten $1 bills and have them flip coins against each other betting their dollars one at a time, and you'll see it take effect. 20% of ppl will soon hold 80% of the dollars. Can't avoid it.
But I've got no complaints. I'm making far more than my father ever did, and even my mother who got a degree. I have no degrees.
The fact we're all here sitting on our butts with our $1000 iPhones and Galaxy phones complaining online about how bad we have it, as we discuss frivolous time wasting hobbies we have spare cash to blow on, is a pretty good indicator we don't really have a grasp on what bad is.
@Wilforce boo hoo for us millennials and gen z's then 😂
@JaxonH 100% this!
@Damo
yes because it's portable. I can fit the switch rather easiely in my backpack.
an additional 33+cm device makes the switch pretty much stationary.
This is like buying a second sceen for a gameboy or a PSP/vita.
it makes no sense and even less in the switch situation as it already features it's own "removable" screen.
Interesting in a technology perspective but the Switch itself is portable.....so.......
@SlimPieEats what are you talking about? You can't just run a USB cable from the Switch to a TV, that won't do anything except provide power to the Switch. You 100% need a dock, to make the Switch even think about outputting a signal at all.
Or are you saying that your screen has a dock built into it, like this one appears to?
@N64-ROX but I do. I have pictures.. I use it everyday and have no dock connected.
from the Amazon page:
For Switch only need connected the upper type-c port, for PS3/4, XBOX one, pls connect the HDMI and the lower type-c port power it at same time.
it's this monitor. http://www.amazon.com/ZSCMALLS-Portable-Computer-Nintendo-Raspberry/dp/B07VFF4TZG?pd_rd_w=5uPK3&pf_rd_p=85da05e5-c593-4314-b5c1-e397081af052&pf_rd_r=5VD7H0DDVNHC03SNHSXQ&pd_rd_r=02386b45-14d8-4fe8-a5ef-b4725984a198&pd_rd_wg=w9h8C&pd_rd_i=B07VFF4TZG&psc=1&ref_=pd_bap_m_rp_2_sc
@SlimPieEats fair enough, I can't argue with that!
@N64-ROX I want to upgrade to a touch screen one next . But that's like 200 more. I'll burn this one out for a while first. I rarely touch the switch screen really anyways.
Interesting with the wireless aspect. I have a few portable monitors as I travel for work. Have the original dock in a basstop dock case to make it more portable.
Used on plenty of plane trips with the switch.
Also use with Xbox series s and computer.
They are great to use around the house as well. Can play something on a little bigger screen (with some of the text on some games not optimize for the switch screen). While someone else is using the tv.
@Royalblues I imagine your face when the Nintendo president said that Switch is now only in the middle of it's planned lifecycle xD (no offense, reading that comment after he made that statement just kinda brings a dumb little chuckle to my face)
Personally, I can fully see where you're coming from, although I would be fully fine if Nintendo just actually gave us a beefier Switch model. I do not even care about 4k or stuff like that, but at least a model that can run all the games in a stable 60 FPS and maybe 1440p. Although if they do release a beefier, more expensive model that is not 4k (which I somehow doubt it would be), then at least 1440p 60Hz (or maybe even 144Hz?) sounds reasonabe enough?
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...